Lite info om Reason
jag hitta det här på ett annat forum.. Det kan ju vara bra att veta!
i've been working on the new London elektricity album for over a
year, and fell in love with Reason last year. I stopped working on
Cubase, + have been writing on reason for the last 12 months - it's
great for when I'm on the road too. I cut a load of dubplates of my
new tracks, and whilst in the mix last week I realised that all my
reason tunes sounded, well, kind of out of focus. so when I got back
to the studio I + the other artist on Hospital did some control
tests, using 2 minute slices of classical music, some d+b, some pop,
and compared how the files sounded in Reason, cubase, Peak +
Protools. It really seems that in Reason there is a big sonic
compromise - I always wondered how Reason can be so economical with
cpu power, and it seems that it's because Reason only uses part of
the waveform. Since then I've been talking to other producers in the
d+b, breaks + garage community, most of whom won't use reason
because of it's sound.
I am gutted, because I love the interface + the genius of the patch
system. I have transferred a couple of the tunes I made in Reason to
Cubase using the source files(unprocessed by Reason) + reconstructed
them exactly. They now sound proper.
Before you rag me out for my disloyalty to Reason, let me say I
still think it's a brilliant tool, it's just that it doesnt have the
necessary sound quality for making top I wish so much that propellerheads would produce a transparent,
power hungry pro version.
He has summarised exactly what I feel perfectly.